No Match, No Vote

The Dangers of Playing with Matches

Congress passed the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) in 2002 to impose fair and more uniform standards for state election administration, including provisions to establish and maintain statewide voter registration databases.

nomatchnovoteHowever, some states have misinterpreted the intent of  database maintenance prodcedures outlined in HAVA and passed onerous “No Match, No Vote” laws. Under such statutes, if a state is unable to match the information on a voter’s registration application with information in an existing government database, the application is denied outright.

Research shows that matching voter data with other government databases is an unreliable, error-laden process, and that conditioning the right to vote on such a flawed system will inevitably disenfranchise eligible citizens.

Most Recent / Relevant Items

Advanced Filters and Sorting

50 results returned

Georgia is using an error-riddled database to reject thousands of voter registrations

News Item See all

Kira Lerner discusses our lawsuit over Georgia's flawed and discriminatory voter verification process. Read more

Georgia’s Discriminatory Voter Verification Process

Post See all

Project Vote President Michael Slater discusses our new lawsuit to protect voters of color in the state of Georgia. Read more

Federal lawsuit alleges Georgia blocked thousands of minority voters

News Item See all

Kristina Torres writes about Project Vote's suit against Georgia's discriminatory voter verification process. Read more

Voting Rights Advocates File New Federal Voting Rights Lawsuit to Protect Voters of Color in the State of Georgia

Press Release See all

Project Vote and partners filed a federal lawsuit today to protect voters of color in Georgia from discriminatory registration verification process. Read more

Lawsuit: Georgia Voter Registration Process Violates the Law

News Item See all

AP story on Project Vote and partners' lawsuit against Georgia's discriminatory voter verification process. Read more

Georgia NAACP v. Kemp (2016): Memo in Support of Motion for PI

Litigation Document See all

Memo in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Georgia NAACP v. Kemp Read more

Georgia NAACP v. Kemp (2016): Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Litigation Document See all

Motion for Preliminary Injunction in Georgia NAACP v. Kemp Read more

Georgia NAACP v. Kemp (2016): Exhibit 4

Litigation Document See all

Exhibit 4 in Georgia NAACP v. Kemp: Garcia-Castillo Notification Letter Read more

Georgia NAACP v. Kemp (2016): Exhibit 3

Litigation Document See all

Exhibit 3 in Georgia NAACP v. Kemp: SSA 2009 IG Report Read more

Georgia NAACP v. Kemp (2016): Exhibit 2

Litigation Document See all

Exhibit 2 in Georgia NAACP v. Kemp: DDS and SSA Notification Letters Read more