Voter registration is only the first step: we also have to make sure that registrants get on the rolls, and stay on the rolls.
That’s why Project Vote works to protect eligible voters from
wrongful purges, voter caging, “ no match, no vote” programs, and other dangerous efforts to “clean-up” the lists.
Additionally, we fight to make sure that voter registration and list maintenance policies are publicly transparent, in order to ensure that states are not using arbitrary, error-prone, or politically-motivated criteria for rejecting applicants or purging voters.
Most Recent / Relevant Items
Advanced Filters and Sorting
District of Columbia
Douglas R. Hess
Erin Ferns Lee
Jean Alia Robles
Jody L Herman Ph.D.
Lorraine Minnite Ph.D.
Michelle Kanter Cohen
Vanessa M. Perez Ph.D.
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
League of Women Voters
Mi Familia Vota
Southern Coalition for Social Justice
Government Agency Registration
55 results returned
A settlement agreement between Maricopa County, Arizona and Project Vote, to ensure that election protection groups have fair and reasonable access to voter registration records as required by the NVRA.
Plaintiff’s opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Appellant's reply brief in ACRU v. Philadelphia City Commissioners
Amicus brief filed by Project Vote and Demos urged a federal appeals court to uphold a decision dismissing an attempt by ACRU to force an illegal voter purge.
Settlement agreement in GA NAACP v. Kemp (2016)
Appellee's brief in ACRU v. Philadelphia City Commissioners
Defendant Kemp’s brief in support of his motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Appellants opening brief in ACRU v. Philadelphia City Commissioners
Answer and defenses in Project Vote v. Kemp.
U.S. Department of Justice submitted this statement of interest in NC NAACP v. NC SBOE, a case concerning wrongful purging of the voter rolls in North Carolina in violation of the National Voter Registration Act.